Thursday, April 10, 2008

3ware 9650se with Tyan i5400xt (S5396)

Just for the record: the 3ware 9650SE-8LPML PCI-Express RAID card will work with the Tyan Tempest i5400xt motherboard. And, Windows Vista Ultimate x64 will automatically download and install drivers for the card. (I don't boot from the RAID, so installation is somewhat easier). Everything works flawlessly, and I'm getting close to 600mb/sec writes to a RAID 6 array (using 8x300GB Maxtor 7200rpm SATA drives).

You will, however, need a recently updated firmware. 3ware has a knowledgebase article about this. The card I bought off ebay was manufactured in December 2006, and the system would not POST with the card installed. 3ware processed an RMA for me and sent me a replacement manufactured in January 2008, which worked flawlessly with the motherboard.

Saturday, March 15, 2008

Video settings for DLA-G11 on Intel G35 graphics

It's spring break so I finally have a weekend to deal with computer upgrades. My system is now running off a brand-new ASUS motherboard, the P5E-VM HDMI. This motherboard is perfect for home theater applications, as it provides Vista-capable integrated video (through an Intel G35 Express chipset) with dual outputs: an HDMI port for digital panels and an HD-15 port for analog monitors. There's a big discussion of this over at AVS Forum. (I am, however, sticking with XP.)

Unfortunately, Powerstrip does not work with Intel video, and I have always depended on Powerstrip to create the custom resolution needed to obtain pixel-perfect output to my JVC DLA-G11 projector. The projector runs at a wacky 1360x1024 resolution; if the settings are off just by a little bit, parts of the screen get chopped off.

The solution is a piece of software called DTD Calculator. Here's how to get it to work.

  1. Download and install the newest video drivers from Intel's website

  2. Set "Graphics Options-->Output to-->Intel(R) Dual Display Clone-->Digital Display+Monitor"

  3. Input the following parameters down the boxes on the left:

    Pixel Clock (MHz)
    139.208
    H Active Pixels
    1360
    H Start of Sync Pulse
    1464
    H End of Sync Pulse
    1608
    H End of Blanking Interval
    1824
    V Active Lines
    1024
    V Start of Sync Pulse
    1025
    V End of Sync Pulse
    1028
    V End of Blanking Interval
    1060
    (Leave "Interlaced" unchecked)
    Sync Profile
    +hsync +vsync

  4. Finally, click on "Registry Hack", "More", "Get Calculated", and then "Write DTDs to the Registry".

Once you reboot, you should have a new "1360x1024" resolution selectable. That should match perfectly with your DLA-G11 or G15 projector. Make sure the projector is connected to the VGA out port, and the input is selected to SXGA3.

The values, by the way, were extracted from Powerstrip....

Saturday, October 20, 2007

Clever Commercial...

Sunday, September 09, 2007

Pop Music

I've been spending some time listening to the Billboard "Hot 100": the top 100 songs of the year, as ranked by Billboard Magazine. The archive I'm listening to includes the Hot 100 from 1959 to 2006, and the Hot 50 from 1947 to 1958. Yes, that's almost 60 years of music, over 5000 tracks.

The archive contains pretty much every pop song you're likely to have encountered through heavy radio play. As an exercise, I decided to go through the entire archive and flag "significant" songs. A song is "significant" for me if 1) it's one of those songs that conjures memories for me, or 2) I like the song.

The result is a list of about 1600 songs. They break down as follows:
1947-1959: 54 songs
1960-1969: 144 songs
1970-1979: 236 songs
1980-1989: 417 songs
1990-2000: 525 songs
2000-2006: 251 songs

The 2000s are not yet finished, but if you extrapolate (divide 251 by 7/10, which is 358), you see a substantial decline from the 80s and 90s. It seems correct to conclude that I'm most familiar with (and I enjoy most) "pop" music in the 80s and 90s, and that I'm getting less familiar with (and I enjoy less) pop music from 2000 and beyond.

What's the best explanation for this? Most probably, it's because I cared a lot more about music in the 80s and 90s (when I was growing up: high school was 88-92 for me), and therefore I have many more memories strongly connected with pop music from those years.

Basically, what this means is that I'm getting old....

Monday, August 27, 2007

Canon DR-2580C document scanner

At the beginning of the month, I had about 10,000 photocopied pages of material that I wanted to keep but didn't have room for. (This is a consequence of moving into an apartment just over half the size of our previous.) The logical choice was to scan everything and throw away the hard copies, so I started researching high-speed scanners. I settled on the Canon DR-2580c. It's been a long time since I've been so satisfied with a technology purchase. I highly recommend the scanner.

It goes for $644 at scantastik.com. Mine arrived two days after I ordered it (shipped from Pennsylvania). It was easy to set up, and the software was fairly easy to use. The unit is rated to scan 25 pages per minute at 200dpi in black/white mode, but 1) it scans both front and back at once and 2) it scans at 300 dpi, both with zero speed decrease. (It also can scan in color, though at a significant speed decrease.)

What's great about the scanner is that it just works. You load up to 50 pages into the document feed and just let it go. Two minutes later, you load another 50 pages an hit continue: the software appends the new pages to the ongoing PDF file it is creating.

The software can detect page orientation, and it can detect blank pages (so you can load single-sided documents along with double-sided documents and it'll figure out what scans to keep), but I turned off all those features because they slow down the scanning. Instead, I am using Adobe Acrobat Standard (version 8 is bundled with the scanner) to post-process the files---Acrobat detects orientation and does OCR on the pages to enable full-text search. The full-text content is kept as an invisible overlay on the original image, so all formatting and images remain. This processing goes slowly---it takes 2-4 seconds per page on my 3GHz, single-core Pentium 4. But it's not a big deal because I just batch the jobs overnight.

The system has an ultrasonic multi-feed detection system which determines with very high accuracy when the paper feed system sucks in more than one page at a time. I found this happened about three times in the 10,000 pages I scanned.

Not everything is perfect, though. The document feeder is not all that good at keeping pages aligned perfectly as they go into the scanner, so the pages tend to come out somewhat skewed. (I think Adobe can correct this in post-processing; I'll have to check it out some more). And feeding in spiral-bound reading packets can be difficult: hole-punched pages can get caught on one another, causing severe skewing and mis-feeds. I found a way to finesse the feeding process so the pages untangle themselves, but it involved my actively attending to document feeder as it scanned.

At $644, I think the device is a great deal. The only consumables with this scanner are the rollers in the document feeders, which must be replaced after every 10,000 pages: this costs $50. The main thing I'd want to improve is the alignment on the paper feeding. I expect the Xerox Documate 252 is the closest competitor to the Canon---it's also a 25 page per minute/50 images per minute document scanner. It costs $100 more at scantastik.com; if it has a markedly superior feeder, that might be worth it. Keep in mind, though, that the Canon is very compact and weighs about four pounds: you can easily carry it around. If portability is at all an issue for you, the Canon is the obvious choice.

PS: I found I could successfully load 100 pages into the paper feeder (double the rated amount) with no troubles, as long as I actively attended to the feeding process to ensure skewing was at a minimum....